A follow up to yesterday's article

There seems to have been a lot of misunderstanding about what yesterday’s article was about. Mostly from people who didn’t read past the topic. So, here’s a summary version more in line with your attention spans.

FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING: UR DOIN’ IT RONG

Comments

Ao on 2008-08-15 18:06:05:

I love you for this.

Erik Engbrecht on 2008-08-15 19:26:14:

http://lemonodor.com/archives/2007/10/youre_doing_it_wrong.html

I think you need your own poster.

david on 2008-08-15 19:38:47:

I’d be too ashamed of my beardlessness.

thom on 2008-08-15 23:10:36:

I guess your article the other day could have been titled “Functional Code !=> Good Code” where “!=>” means “does not (necessarily) imply”. The “!” ideally would be a cross through the =>. anyway..

david on 2008-08-15 23:31:13:

It could. But the title was still accurate and the meaning was clear to people who actually bothered to read the article rather than have a kneejerk reaction to it. I stand by the title as it currently is.

Josh Suereth on 2008-08-16 03:49:52:

Just wanted to say I appreciated the first post a lot. I’d be concerned If I still had the feeling that all FP programmer believe that FP code is automatically better than other styles of coding.